/China draws global condemnation for new Hong Kong security law

China draws global condemnation for new Hong Kong security law

China has passed a sweeping national security law for Hong Kong, increasing its power over the territory in a move that drew swift condemnation from the US and Europe.

The legislation was introduced after the territory was rocked by anti-government protests Beijing said were inspired by foreign forces. It was enacted without discussion by Hong Kong’s own legislature, in an unprecedented show of China’s control over the city’s legal system.

The new law will increase Beijing’s grip on the territory, which is meant to have a high level of autonomy under the conditions of its handover from British rule back to China in 1997.

The Trump administration said the new law was a “violation” of China’s commitments under the Sino-British Joint Declaration.

“As Beijing now treats Hong Kong as ‘One Country, One System,’ so must the United States,” said John Ullyot, the National Security Council spokesperson. “The United States will continue to take strong actions against those who smothered Hong Kong’s freedom and autonomy. We urge Beijing to reverse course immediately.”

Under the new law, Chinese state security agencies will also be allowed to operate openly in Hong Kong for the first time. The legislation applies to people in Hong Kong and to those not in the territory, meaning that foreign nationals who speak in favour of independence for the region, or advocate sanctions on China, could be prosecuted upon entering Hong Kong or mainland China.

Damaging public transport with intent to cause “serious social harm” is considered a terrorist act under the new law, which also gives Beijing the power to adjudicate national security crimes when requested by Hong Kong’s new state security bureau.

Dominic Raab, the UK foreign secretary, said the new law was a “grave step, which is deeply troubling”.

Brussels also criticised the passage of the law. “We deplore the decision,” said Charles Michel, president of the European Council of leaders of EU member states. “This law risks seriously undermining the high degree of autonomy of Hong Kong and having a detrimental effect on the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law.”

Eric Cheung, a legal expert at the University of Hong Kong, said the actual law is “much worse” than he had expected. 

Pro-democracy supporters hold a Hong Kong Independence flag during a rally against the national security law in a shopping mall on Tuesday © Anthony Kwan/Getty

“The extraterritorial effect of this piece of legislation I think will really alarm all the foreigners and foreign investment and no one could now feel safe.” People who took a transit flight through Hong Kong risked being arrested, he said.

Ahead of the Chinese move, the UK said it would prepare a “pathway to citizenship” for as many as 3m Hong Kongers who were eligible to apply for British National (Overseas) passports.

The US said it would bar companies from exporting weapons and sensitive technologies to Hong Kong because of concerns that they could be obtained by the Chinese military. The administration is also considering moves that would further unravel the special trade privileges that Hong Kong has enjoyed since handover on the grounds that it was not under the control of the Chinese government.

Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission president, warned last week of “very negative consequences” if China pushed ahead with the law. She added that the EU had been discussing the matter with its partners in the G7 group of western powers and Japan. But the European bloc has yet to specify what measures, if any, it might take in response.

Carrie Lam, Hong Kong’s chief executive, speaks at a news conference in Hong Kong on Tuesday © Lam Yik/Bloomberg

Hong Kong’s police force can intercept communications and carry covert surveillance on suspects, with the approval of the region’s chief executive, currently Carrie Lam, who has become deeply unpopular with locals since last year’s protests.

The chief executive also has the power to select judges to preside over national security cases, in contrast to the current system, in which judicial assignments are made by the judiciary.

Original Source